🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the presentation of a new 28-article proposal for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: another massive barrage of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of conflicting incidents captured the bleak nature of the recent timeframe. By day, negotiation efforts are waged: hopeful statements are issued from multiple capitals. Immense energy is devoted on managing particular approaches. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was revealed. Ukraine is able to track missile launches from across the border, a ability enabled by current data. From observation points, military aircraft that had been dispatched to counter approaching aerial threats streaked across the sky – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons engaged: defensive missiles fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably delivered by partner states. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, causing tremors. The instant of fear quickly becomes sober acceptance: possibly the incoming missile won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and further power outages.

Ongoing Risks

Soon after, a heavy machine gun engaged a drone somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – most likely imported technology. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its destination.

With pauses, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: several casualties, damage and heating outages in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As always, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those 24 hours encapsulated Ukraine's vital need on Western support – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the short term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The comprehensive proposal from American leadership provoked deep reactions, debate and deep concern – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new initiative from American administration unfolds according to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, effectively counters. They contain the crisis but never actually secure success. This cycle will, certainly, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is convenient to criticize particular leaders of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington functions according to a premise well known to international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government believes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to relinquish the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does nothing to deter Moscow, through words or deeds, from assuming that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its advantage in the months ahead.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Russian leadership is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its partners are coming close to fatigue. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but averting a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its favour.

Current Realities

Factually, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: political desires to mediate resolution and secure international recognition, and Kyiv's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their focus does not move to homefront challenges. And although their task will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to kill the proposed articles of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all did their job.

While new plans based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist diplomatic offensives from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and show certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they maintain solidarity and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require continued Western support.